Cardiac Arrest in Traumatic Brain Injury

Article information

J Neurointensive Care. 2024;7(1):12-17
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 April 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.32587/jnic.2024.00773
1Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
2Department of Neurosurgery, Holy Family Red Crescent Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh
3Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Clinic, Birgunj, Nepal
4Department of Medicine, Multispeciality Trauma and ICCU Centre, Sardar Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
5Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
Corresponding author: Bipin Chaurasia, MS, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Clinic, Madhesh pradesh, Birgunj 44300, Nepal Tel: +9779845454636, E-mail: trozexa@gmail.com
Received 2024 January 24; Accepted 2024 April 18.

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant global health concern with substantial contributions to illness and mortality rates. This study aims to scrutinize the intricate interplay between neurological and circulatory abnormalities post-TBI, particularly focusing on the challenge posed by cardiac arrest in TBI patients. The study employs a comprehensive approach, utilizing clinical assessments, electrocardiograms, intracranial pressure monitoring, brain imaging, and biomarker utilization. It explores the effectiveness of these methods in detecting cardiac arrest in TBI patients. Additionally, the research delves into resuscitation techniques, hemodynamic stabilization, intracranial pressure management, and neurological enhancement as potential therapeutic modalities. The results highlight the importance of prompt initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and adherence to advanced cardiac life support protocols in TBI patients with cardiac arrest. Prognostic factors such as injury severity, response time, effectiveness of resuscitation interventions, and pre-existing medical conditions are identified as crucial elements in predicting cardiac arrest outcomes in TBI patients. The study concludes by emphasizing the critical necessity of a comprehensive approach to understand and manage the complex relationship between cardiac arrest and TBI. Incorporating scientific discoveries, clinical perspectives, and technological advancements, the review underscores the importance of addressing this multifaceted medical challenge through a thorough analysis and effective management strategies.

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac arrest in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents a multidimensional and potentially fatal medical emergency, posing a unique challenge for healthcare personnel and physicians1). TBI is characterized by abrupt and substantial brain damage resulting from external forces, triggering a cascade of physiological events, including disturbances in cardiovascular function that can culminate in cardiac arrest1). The intricate interplay between neurological and cardiovascular pathologies identified in these cases underscores the necessity for a multidisciplinary approach to accurately diagnose, manage, and treat these conditions1). The occurrence of cardiac arrest in TBI patients significantly impacts both survival rates and neurological outcomes, creating a considerable obstacle to effective resuscitation and rehabilitation2). The presence of concurrent injuries or complications further complicates this critical condition, making prompt recognition and treatment of cardiac arrest more challenging2). The pathophysiology of cardiac arrest in TBI involves a myriad of interacting factors. Elevated intracranial pressure, alterations in cerebral autoregulation, heightened sympathetic activity, and the incidence of secondary brain injuries are among the identified risk factors2-5). The objective of this study was to explore the intricate relationship between cardiac arrest and TBI, elucidating the underlying mechanisms, risk factors, and potential therapeutic options that may contribute to overall outcomes (Fig. 1)2-5).

Fig. 1.

This figure delineates the pathophysiological and cellulo-molecular alterations occurring during cardiac arrest in traumatic brain injury. PARP: Poly-ADP ribose polymerase; NK-kb: Nuclear factor kappa B; DAMP: Danger-associated molecular patterns.

METHODS

Cardiac arrest in TBI patients was the focus of this literature review, which aimed to synthesize and evaluate previous research on the subject. To gather up-to-date literature on this subject, electronic databases such as PubMed, Science Direct, and Web of Science were meticulously examined. Cardiopulmonary arrest, severe brain damage, and neurological-circulatory abnormalities were some of the MeSH keywords utilized. To expand the data set, we also looked through the reference lists of selected papers. Because it did not include any direct human participants, this study did not need permission from the institutional board's review for human research ethics.

Research with patients participating in either qualitative or quantitative investigations met the inclusion criteria. We only looked at items that were published in English. To guarantee a thorough examination of the results, only publications from peer-reviewed journals were considered. The abstracts and complete texts were evaluated by two authors who complied with the criteria for exclusion and inclusion, and a third author resolved any disagreements that arose to reduce the possibility of bias.

OVERVIEW

Yang et al.6) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing target temperature management (TTM) against normal temperature management (NTM) for cardiac arrest following TBI. In contrast to neurotherapeutic medicine, their meta-analysis revealed that TTM did not reduce mortality rates. However, it is noteworthy that for individuals with moderate or severe symptoms in the early stages, TTM might still hold potential in reducing death rates and improving prognosis. Specifically, TTM has demonstrated greater effectiveness in the early phases of moderate and severe conditions compared to NTM, leading to enhanced prognostic outcomes. Kochanek et al.7) emphasized in their review that managing clinical outcomes for infants and children who have experienced severe TBI or asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest involves a series of therapies spanning various medical settings from the field to emergency rooms, intensive care units, rehabilitation centers, and potentially beyond. Despite the distinctions between these widely recognized pediatric traumas, prompt implementation of interventions aimed at preventing neuronal death in either scenario is likely crucial, possibly beginning at the injury site. According to Kochanek et al.7), managing cerebral edema, a pathophysiological condition often treated in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), is more favorable as prevention rather than cure. Finally, this research delves into alternative therapies for individuals with severe brain injuries, exploring the potential for altering damaged neural networks and enhancing regenerative processes.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Individuals who have suffered TBI face an increased risk of cardiac arrest due to a complex interplay of factors stemming from direct damage to the brain and the body's physiological responses to trauma. One primary etiology is the rise in intracranial pressure (ICP) resulting from a traumatic event. Elevated ICP can impact cerebral blood flow, escalating the risk of cardiovascular complications3). TBI is associated with abnormalities in autoregulation that impair the brain's ability to adequately control blood flow and perfusion, heightening the risk of cardiac arrest. The body's physiological response to trauma includes increased sympathetic activity, potentially leading to substantial increases in heart rate and blood pressure, thereby elevating the risk of cardiac arrest. Furthermore, the development of anoxia and reperfusion injury following trauma, signifying damage due to the restoration of blood flow, can adversely affect vital organs such as the heart. Additionally, the systemic inflammatory response commonly observed after TBI can trigger a chain of physiological events significantly impacting cardiovascular function and increasing the risk of cardiac arrest7). Individuals with TBI may experience issues with hypoxia and hypotension, further heightening the likelihood of cardiac arrest. TBIs can induce electrolyte imbalances, disrupting the heart's normal electrical activity, potentially resulting in arrhythmias and cardiac arrest. Brainstem involvement, brain herniation, contusions, or hemorrhages within the brainstem can profoundly affect the body's regulation of critical physiological functions, including heart activity.

EXPLORING THE ROLE OF BIOMARKERS

Biomarkers have emerged as critical diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tools in the complex domains of TBI and cardiac arrest. Various biomarkers, extensively researched in the context of brain injuries, provide insights into severity and prognosis (Table 1). Proteins such as S100B, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are among these indicators3). Inflammatory biomarkers like interleukin-8 (IL-8) and molecular elements such as microRNAs have shown promise in diagnosis and prognosis. Jarvis and Fink5) note that these biomarkers can be detected in blood samples, cerebrospinal fluid, and through modern neuroimaging techniques, rendering them useful in clinical assessments. Identified biomarkers hold potential in tailoring treatment regimens for both TBI and cardiac arrest situations. However, to enhance diagnostic precision, discovering composite panels, developing consistent testing methodologies, and comprehensive evaluation of these biomarkers prior to clinical use are crucial8-11). Nonetheless, transitioning biomarkers from research investigations to clinical practice necessitates a rigorous validation process12-15). Thorough testing is imperative to ensure their clinical utility, accuracy, and reliability16). Slovis17) emphasizes the necessity for substantial clinical investigations to validate the usefulness of biomarkers in improving patient outcomes and providing significant insights for medical decision-making. Mussack et al.10) investigated the blood levels of S-100B and Interleukin-8 in individuals experiencing cardiac arrest or traumatic brain injury. Their study evaluated levels upon admission and after 12 hours, followed by a 12-month assessment of long-term neurological implications. Results indicated higher levels of S-100B and Interleukin-8 at the scene of cardiac arrest, which increased after 12 hours. These findings demonstrate observable changes in S-100B and Interleukin-8 levels in individuals with both cardiac arrest and TBI. Zhao et al.16) selected 42 out of 402 TBI patients admitted to Stony Brook University Hospital with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8. These patients experienced cardiac arrest during their stay. Seven of the eight patients involved in the accident displayed good neurological function and survived, leading to a discharge rate of 19.0%. The research identified GCS at admission and bilateral pupil responsiveness as significant predictive factors for survival. Surviving patients had an average GCS of 5.3, while non-survivors averaged 3.2 (p=0.020). Prout et al.12) examined biomarkers' potential value in diagnosing, assessing damage severity, and predicting outcomes in pediatric patients with TBI and cardiac arrest. Their work underscores the importance of supplementary prognostic indicators following TBI, specifically highlighting both the absolute rise in central nervous system-based macromolecules and the timing of their elevation. Post-TBI, pathophysiological pathways involve indicators linked to inflammatory mediators, oxidative stress response alterations, and energy metabolism abnormalities (Fig. 1).

Synopsis of studies on cardiac arrest and traumatic brain injury

DIAGNOSTIC APPROACHES

Diagnostic approaches for identifying cardiac arrest episodes in individuals with TBI encompass various clinical tests and monitoring techniques. The clinical assessment, encompassing vital signs, neurological function, and overall clinical well-being, remains crucial. Electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring is vital to detect arrhythmias and irregularities signaling cardiac arrest6). Testing cardiac enzymes and troponin can also confirm heart involvement. Continuous electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring aids in seizure detection and identifying changes in brain electrical activity suggesting cardiac issues. Sandroni et al. recognized somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) as valuable in assessing sensory pathway integrity. These potentials can be used to evaluate the potential role of the brainstem in cardiac arrest occurrences. Monitoring ICP is crucial in managing TBI patients experiencing cardiac arrest as elevated ICP can restrict cerebral blood flow and worsen cardiac complications. Assessing brain structural integrity is pivotal to evaluating potential brainstem involvement and its impact on cardiac function. Reis et al.13) note that brain imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide valuable information. Laboratory tests, including blood analysis, can determine the body's physiological response to TBI and unveil metabolic anomalies affecting cardiovascular health. Echocardiography enables real-time monitoring of cardiac dynamics and identification of anomalies in heart anatomy and function. Combining these diagnostic techniques establishes a comprehensive framework for detecting cardiac arrest in TBI patients, facilitating prompt interventions and tailored treatment strategies based on individual patient conditions9,17-20).

THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS

Given the intricate interplay between neurological and circulatory factors, an integrated therapeutic approach is essential in managing cardiac arrest in individuals with TBI. Therapeutic options encompass a spectrum of interventions targeting resuscitation, hemodynamic stabilization, intracranial pressure control, and neurological outcomes improvement13,21-23). Restoring circulation relies on the prompt initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and adherence to advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines. Ensuring proper airway management to guarantee adequate oxygenation and breathing is crucial to reduce the risk of further neurological damage in TBI patients experiencing cardiac arrest. Maintaining hemodynamic stability is essential to supply adequate blood flow to the brain. Cronberg et al.1) highlight achieving optimal blood flow in the injured brain via techniques like fluid resuscitation and judicious use of vasoactive drugs. Therapeutic hypothermia emerges as a treatment option aimed at reducing secondary brain injury and improving neurological outcomes post-cardiac arrest. Precisely regulating body temperature is pivotal in this approach. Yang et al.6) suggest that customized temperature management plays a significant role in neuroprotection by reducing oxidative stress and inflammation through precise temperature regulation. Additionally, interventions aimed at enhancing oxygen delivery and maintaining cerebral perfusion pressure should be considered to foster tissue recovery and maintain metabolic equilibrium within circulatory and cerebral systems. Managing ICP assumes importance in TBI patients experiencing cardiac arrest. Strategies like head-of-bed elevation, osmotic agent administration, and adjustments to respiratory parameters aim to prevent ICP elevation. Neuroprotective strategies, such as vigilant avoidance of hypotension and hyperthermia, safeguard the vulnerable brain from further injury. Continuous monitoring is indispensable in treating cardiac arrest in TBI patients. Continuous monitoring of neurological status, hemodynamic parameters, and vital signs informs treatment decisions and evaluates intervention efficacy. Leveraging modern monitoring technologies, including cerebral oxygenation measures and intracranial pressure monitoring, has the potential to significantly enhance therapeutic precision and efficacy for patients.

ANIMAL MODEL EVIDENCE

Jackson et al.4) evaluated compounds NSC13378, NSC25247, and NSC74429 in animal models, highlighting promising chemical characteristics for potential CNS targeting. Before this study, no research on neuroprotection using PHLPP inhibitors had been conducted. Neuronal culture tests indicated that NSC74429 displayed the highest level of neuroprotection at micromolar concentrations. NSC74429 demonstrated neuroprotective effects against staurosporine-induced apoptosis, glutamate-induced excitotoxicity, and hydrogen peroxide-induced necrosis/oxidative stress. Subsequent testing revealed that administering NSC74429 at a dose of 1 mg/kg for three days enhanced hippocampal survival in both rat models of suffocating cardiac arrest and mouse models of severe traumatic brain injury.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the pathophysiological intricacies and reasons behind cardiac arrest in individuals with TBI holds paramount importance for medical practitioners. This comprehension is pivotal in enhancing the standard of patient care, elevating survival rates, and ultimately improving long-term neurological outcomes. The pursuit of novel therapies and advancements in multidisciplinary healthcare represents an ongoing endeavor aimed at mitigating the severe implications of cardiac arrest in TBI patients. Through this analysis of the intricate clinical scenario under consideration, our aim is to provide a comprehensive examination of current knowledge, underscore key areas necessitating further investigation, and foster continuous efforts to refine the treatment and enhance outcomes for individuals experiencing cardiac arrest in the context of TBI.

Notes

Ethics statement

This study was a literature review of previously published studies and was therefore exempt from institutional review board approval.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: OA, BC. Data curation: OA, VC. Formal analysis: OA, MMR, VC, AA. Methodology: OA, MMR, BC. Visualization: MMR, BC, VC. Project administration: OA. Writing - original draft: OA, Writing - review & editing: MMR, BC, AA.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest to disclose.

Funding

None.

Data availability

None.

Acknowledgements

None.

References

1. Cronberg T, Greer DM, Lilja G, Moulaert V, Swindell P, Rossetti AO. Brain injury after cardiac arrest: from prognostication of comatose patients to rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol 2020;19:611–622.
2. Dash PK, Zhao J, Hergenroeder G, Moore AN. Biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis, and evaluation of treatment efficacy for traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics 2010;7:100–114.
3. Esdaille CJ, Coppler PJ, Faro JW, Weisner ZM, Condle JP, Elmer J, et al, ; Pittsburgh Post Cardiac Arrest Service. Duration and clinical features of cardiac arrest predict early severe cerebral edema. Resuscitation 2020;153:111–118.
4. Jackson TC, Dezfulian C, Vagni VA, Stezoski J, Janesko-Feldman K, Kochanek PM. PHLPP inhibitor NSC74429 is neuroprotective in rodent models of cardiac arrest and traumatic brain injury. Biomolecules 2022;12:1352.
5. Jarvis JM, Fink EL. Neurofilament light chain-it is not just about concussions. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020;21:685–686.
6. Yang Z, Song Z, Hou M. Target temperature management versus normal temperature management for cardiac arrest after traumatic brain injury patient: a meta-analysis and systemic review. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag 2022;12:139–145.
7. Kochanek PM, Clark RS, Ruppel RA, Dixon CE. Cerebral resuscitation after traumatic brain injury and cardiopulmonary arrest in infants and children in the new millennium. Pediatr Clin North Am 2001;48:661–681.
8. Lim HB, Smith M. Systemic complications after head injury: a clinical review. Anaesthesia 2007;62:474–482.
9. Lemiale V, Dumas F, Mongardon N, Giovanetti O, Charpentier J, Chiche JD, et al. Intensive care unit mortality after cardiac arrest: the relative contribution of shock and brain injury in a large cohort. Intensive Care Med 2013;39:1972–1980.
10. Mussack T, Biberthaler P, Kanz KG, Wiedemann E, Gippner-Steppert C, Mutschler W, et al. Serum S-100B and interleukin-8 as predictive markers for comparative neurologic outcome analysis of patients after cardiac arrest and severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med 2002;30:2669–2674.
11. Meaney DF, Morrison B, Dale Bass C. The mechanics of traumatic brain injury: a review of what we know and what we need to know for reducing its societal burden. J Biomech Eng 2014;136:021008.
12. Prout AJ, Wolf MS, Fink EL. Translating biomarkers from research to clinical use in pediatric neurocritical care: focus on traumatic brain injury and cardiac arrest. Curr Opin Pediatr 2017;29:272–279.
13. Reis C, Akyol O, Araujo C, Huang L, Enkhjargal B, Malaguit J, et al. Pathophysiology and the monitoring methods for cardiac arrest associated brain injury. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:129.
14. Ramiro JI, Kumar A. Updates on management of anoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest. Mo Med 2015;112:136–141.
15. Sekhon MS, Ainslie PN, Griesdale DE. Clinical pathophysiology of hypoxic ischemic brain injury after cardiac arrest: a "two-hit" model. Crit Care 2017;21:90.
16. Zhao Z, Liang JJ, Wang Z, Winans NJ, Morris M, Doyle S, et al. Cardiac arrest after severe traumatic brain injury can be survivable with good outcomes. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2021;6:e000638.
17. Slovis JC, Bach A, Beaulieu F, Zuckerberg G, Topjian A, Kirschen MP. Neuromonitoring after pediatric cardiac arrest: cerebral physiology and injury stratification. Neurocrit Care 2024;40:99–115.
18. Saraceno G, Servadei F, Di Bergamo LT, Iaccarino C, Rubiano AM, Zoia C, et al. Do neurosurgeons follow the guidelines? A world-based survey on severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Sci 2021;65:465–473.
19. Stocchetti N, Carbonara M, Citerio G, Ercole A, Skrifvars MB, Smielewski P, et al. Severe traumatic brain injury: targeted management in the intensive care unit. Lancet Neurol 2017;16:452–464.
20. Sandroni C, Cronberg T, Sekhon M. Brain injury after cardiac arrest: pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis. Intensive Care Med 2021;47:1393–1414.
21. Kirschen MP, Yehya N, Graham K, Kilbaugh T, Berg RA, Topjian A, et al. Circulating neurofilament light chain is associated with survival after pediatric cardiac arrest. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020;21:656–661.
22. Saraceno G, Servadei F, Terzi Di Bergamo L, Iaccarino C, Rubiano AM, Zoia C, et al. Do neurosurgeons follow the guidelines? A world-based survey on severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Sci 2021;65:465–73.
23. Bozkurt I, Umana GE, Deora H, Wellington J, Karakoc E, Chaurasia B. Factors affecting neurosurgeons' decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatments after traumatic brain injury. World neurosurgery 2022;159:e311–e323.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

This figure delineates the pathophysiological and cellulo-molecular alterations occurring during cardiac arrest in traumatic brain injury. PARP: Poly-ADP ribose polymerase; NK-kb: Nuclear factor kappa B; DAMP: Danger-associated molecular patterns.

Table 1.

Synopsis of studies on cardiac arrest and traumatic brain injury

Study Authors/year Study Type Population Outcome Measures Results
1 Kochanek et al. 20017) Review Pediatric TBI and Cardiac Arrest Diagnosis, Prognostication The importance of individualized treatments based on biomarkers is emphasized.
2 Jackson et al. 20224) Experimental Neuroprotection Experimental PHLPP inhibitors The compound NSC74429 has demonstrated neuroprotective effects against several modes of injury.
3 Mussack et al. 200210) Prospective Cohort Cardiac Arrest and TBI S-100B and IL-8 serum levels There is a positive correlation between elevated levels of S-100B and IL-8 and unfavorable outcomes.
4 Yang et al. 20226) Meta-Analysis Cardiac Arrest and TBI Mortality, Prognosis TTM has the ability to enhance the prognosis of individuals with moderate and severe conditions.
5 Prout et al. 201712) Review Pediatric TBI and Cardiac Arrest Biomarker Investigation The utilization of biomarkers has the potential to improve the processes of diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.
6 Zhao et al. 202116) Retrospective Review Cardiac Arrest and TBI Survival, Neurological Function The survival rate is associated with the GCS score and pupil reactivity.

TBI: Traumatic brain injury; GCS: Glascow-Coma-Scale; TTM: Target temperature management.